this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6191 readers
2 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

alt-text for thumbnail: The words: ""biological" sex is the gender binary" on a 2d digital art wooden background next to the non-binary flag

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (20 children)

Those who can have babies

Those who cannot

That’s where the difference comes from, biologically

[–] elfpie@beehaw.org 5 points 2 months ago

Did you watch the video I put in my comment? It explains the different processes involved in sex differentiation.

Your argument has the same issues as many of the others of the same kind, it doesn't reflect reality. You say there are biological differences, which we can accept, but, when a baby is born or when you see someone, those biological differences are assumed instead of being tested.

What I see is colloquial language and scientific language being equated.

  • Society divided sex into A and B, doctors forced and keep forcing everyone into those categories.

  • Science divides into A, B, C, D, E..., which are not easily perceived.

  • Society, instead of adapting or accepting its limitations, decides to choose a characteristic to be scientific, but they don't test anything. They are just being prescriptive with their language.

In other words, you can't tell the gender or sex of someone by just looking at them. One piece of anatomy is not enough, one specific chromosome is not enough, one specific gene is not enough.

load more comments (19 replies)