this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
233 points (97.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1937 readers
601 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Nobody should just have 300 million available in spending money that they can throw at politics.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

When spending money determines who wins or loses an election or political career .... why keep referring to it as a democracy.

A political system that runs on money is known as a plutocracy and a system that runs on the power of a few wealthy people is known as an oligarchy.

Whatever this system is now .... it definitely does not run on the will of the people ... which is what democracy is.

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

We don’t. You’re just saying the loud part out loud.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

When dozens of billionaires are funding your operation, that much money makes sense. However, Trump constantly lies about everything and Kamala announced a few hundred million raised in the first week she began her campaign so he's most likely trying to sound just popular as her by saying he also has a lot of money.

Campaign finance reform now!