this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
203 points (80.3% liked)

Dank Memes

6250 readers
387 users here now

This is the place to be on the interweb when Reddit irreversibly becomes a meme itself and implodes

If you are existing mods from r/dankmemes, you should be mod here too, kindly DM me on either platform

The many rules inherited from

  1. Be nice, don't be not nice
  2. No Bigotry or Bullying
  3. Don't be a dick!
  4. Censor any and all personal information from posts and comments
  5. No spam, outside links, or videos.
  6. No Metabaiting
  7. No brigading
  8. Keep it dank!
  9. Mark NSFW and spoilers appropriately
  10. NO REEEEEEE-POSTS!
  11. No shitposting
  12. Format your meme correctly. No posts where the title is the meme caption!
  13. No agenda posting!
  14. Don't be a critic
  15. Karma threshold? What's that?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
BurningTurtle@lemmy.burningturtle.win
BurningTurtle@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
203
gee, I wonder why (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by maennersindautos@lemmy.world to c/dankmemes@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Indeed.

Point to where I said anything about it's morality, I'll wait.

No part of your speech was ever my point or even mentioned by me.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If it's not wrong, what's your point? Why's it got you all in a twist if it's not wrong? People don't put in such a show condemning a thing if they don't think it's wrong, so either grow a spine and stand by what you're clearly projecting into the world, or stop moaning.

This shit is art, not a literal retelling of a thing that happened. Even if it does mirror the thoughts and feelings at the time, it's absolutely still embellished, and even if it wasn't, no one was hurt (except arguably Hailey, again different argument) so I really don't see the problem.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My point was it is not more nuanced then that, that's all. Stand by your bullshit argument and point to where I condemned it or shut the fuck up big man.

No one says it is always literal, in this case the very post your commenting on has the artist admitting that is the way he actually felt at the time so in this case it's quite literal.

You don't know what you're even arguing about but I do enjoy the unearned confidence.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

in this case the very post your commenting on has the artist admitting that is the way he actually felt at the time so in this case it's quite literal.

What does it matter if it's literal? That's the entire point I'm making. People say and feel things that they shouldn't act on all the time.

So, what's the point in saying he actually felt those things at the time? If I'm missing it so broadly, fill me in. Why does it matter that he said those things?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This shit is art, not a literal retelling of a thing that happened.

You brought it up, if you don't know what you said how can I know what you meant.

Because that was my point, the fact you don't know your point means I don't expect you to know mine.

Ed: can't help but notice you have yet again failed to quote me to prove your argument, so who doesn't have a spine again?