this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
201 points (98.1% liked)

Ukraine

8227 readers
667 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Moscow is too close. They need to reach the north korea border to stop importation of somethings. Also they need to hit airfields in Siberia where bombers are sored.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They don’t need to reach that border. Just far enough to target remote sections of the train lines that run there.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Are train tracks actually something one would target with an expensive weapon like a long-range cruise missile?

I was under the impression that this wouldnt be worth it, considering replacing a destroyed section of tracks would be rather trivial. Unless you target harder to repair structures such as bridges.

[–] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 8 points 3 months ago

Train tracks are quick to repair. Bridges however are a good target

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Well if you’re aiming for the North Korean border as the original post suggested then you’re likely targeting railroad infrastructure. To get to the NK border you have to go a long roundabout route to avoid encroaching on Chinese airspace. Taking out train choke points even half way closer to Ukraine would be a lot easier, and still cause a lot of disruption of supplies from NK. I’m sure there are plenty of bridges, tunnels, etc. that could be targeted.