Ukraine

8208 readers

762 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lisko@sopuli.xyz

doo@sh.itjust.works

Burstar@sopuli.xyz

104

Toyota Mirai Turned Into Hydrogen Bomb By Ukrainian Forces Explodes With The Force Of 400 Pounds Of TNT (autos.yahoo.com)

submitted 2 months ago by SeaJ@lemm.ee to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

no one says hydrogen bomb referring to conventional arms. it's not a thing.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

no one says hydrogen bomb referring to conventional arms.

Bold claim, considering you're posting in a thread where the article does exactly that. 🤣

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

fortunately, this stupid thread doesn't encompass the rest of the ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD.

bold claim? pull your head out

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, you did say "no one". Cheer up grumpy-pants!

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

you're entirely correct, I should have stated 'no one with half a brain or a quarter of an education would make that mistake.'

appreciate the feedback.

[+] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world -9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd also say a majority of people also don't know the term in relation to nuclear weapons either. The average person is extremely uneducated about anything nuclear. They don't know what differences between the original bombs the US dropped and modern nuclear weapons weapons might be. Even post-Oppenheimer film.

Differentiating between Nuclear and Thermonuclear weapons is something pedants in online forums do, not normies in the real world.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I completely disagree with you. A hydrogen bomb has meant nuclear weapons for 50ish years to anyone with a passing familiarity - and a whole shitton of people learned during the cold war that there were nuclear and thermonuclear weapons, they built fucking shelters in their back yards lol.

so no, disagree with you.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, for anecdotal proof of the average person... Since that's all we have here... both of my boomer parents that lived through the cold war, and were those children sheltering under fucking desks as of that would make a damned difference, didn't think it was related to a nuclear weapon at all.

It's a Yahoo Autos article for fucks sake, because it isn't a nuke, no one would mistake it for a nuke. Only dipshits online trying to argue because they're incapable of admitting their initial assumption of a headline didn't actually make sense in context.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

both of my boomer parents that lived through the cold war, and were those children sheltering under fucking desks as of that would make a damned difference, didn’t think it was related to a nuclear weapon at all.

In the 80s we still did the air raid drills. Lived near a bunch of SAC bases - we basically knew that in the age of thermonuclear weapons and adjacent targets (whiteman, offut, carswell etc), we were fucked.

The reason I dislike the terminology being muddled is that I don't want Russians to have it as a talking point if they escalate. And since Ukraine is taking Kursk at an astounding rate, never underestimate the bullshit RU will spout to justify their panicked responses.

the terminology predates you but it's not esoteric knowledge at all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon