this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
102 points (94.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7213 readers
481 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Its that you make this comment without any comprehension of history.

In 1958, you would have been writing this exact same comment about a sit-in protest being "bad protest". Your worldview just rewrites you into being on the right side of history on things, when now, when you have the opportunity to be on the right side of history while its happening, you aren't.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dude, I literally havent take a side, I am just telling you what I think works and what doesnt. If you think getting people fighting mad on a freeway is a way to win people over, I would have to disagree.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I am just telling you what I think works and what doesnt.

Like, I don't know how else to explain this to you, but that is quite literally a "side", both now and historically, in this discussion.

Read or learn literally anything about the history of protestation.

I assure you, you are already on a side, even if you dont know you are.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

Again, no I am not taking a side, I am informing on what type of protest would be effective in my opinion.