this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
2011 points (98.6% liked)

Political Memes

5413 readers
2927 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 months ago (10 children)

I don't know that it's net positive, probably closer to net neutral at best. A very small minority benefits from tampons in the boys room (trans and girls that ask boys to fetch one for them) and the cost is probably low, but definitely not free.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 10 points 3 months ago (9 children)

What is the cost?? That boys learn about things they should not know about? And don't tell me the extra tampons, that's not how that works

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Extra tampons, dispensers, installation and maintenance on those. Like I said, a low but non-zero cost for a small benefit (tampons in the boys bathroom) utilized by a tiny minority (trans girls and girls that send boys to fetch them tampons in an emergency). It might actually be a net positive (compared to what you could do by taking the funding used to include boys bathrooms in the tampon program and spending it on something else), but if it is it's not going to be much of one just because of how small the total benefit is.

[–] kingcake@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You simply eliminate gendered bathrooms all together and save a bunch of money.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You could, doing so would likely increase utilization of the tampon policy meaning it would have a larger benefit for the same cost.

I suspect if you tried to in schools you'd end up with a weird Title IX ruling that claimed that not having a girls room (regardless of availability of a unisex restroom) is sex discrimination in a way that not having a boys room isn't, because equity. They have a bad habit of taking that kind of approach, see school sports.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)