this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
774 points (99.7% liked)

News

23301 readers
3299 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 83 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Can they go after restaurants adding mandatory 20% fees? I don't mind paying more to pay for ethical pay for employees but adding a mandatory 20% free us just lying about menu prices. It should illegal. Just bake the price into the menu prices.

[–] artichokecustard@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

where do you live that tipping is mandatory? or are you talking about something else?

[–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 16 points 3 months ago

It is essentially a tip, but it's listed on the bottom of the menu as a mandatory service charge. The restaurant keeps the money (it's not split like case tips) and just pay the employees a good wage without them relying on tips.

It's good in theory but it's dishonest pricing.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd say the same about any "fees" that get tacked on above any advertised prices. The only time it shouldn't be included in an advertised price is when it doesn't scale with number of things purchased. So a % fee would always be included, but flat fees can be separated (like if they had a table charge or something that didn't change based on how much food was ordered).

Online shop "convenience" fees are at the top of my mind for this. Especially because there's even more convenience on the merchant's side due to how websites scale vs brick and mortar shops. They might have to pay large salaries to developers and IT people (emphasis on "might"), but that'll be much less than the leases and staffing costs to open physical stores to serve the same size of market.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Agreed. The only fee I can swallow is mom-and-pop stores and governments charging a small fee for credit card processing.

In the government's case, law only provides for them to charge $X and they must gather $X. They can't make up for the provider fees. Legislation should roll that into consideration moving forward.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Or even better, create a public payment infrastructure that isn't predatory to both merchants and consumers. Finance being a private industry instead of a public service is a part of the problem.

But I agree that that is an example of a good use of fees. "Oh, if you do this thing, it costs more money to service you, so rather than pricing it in for everyone regardless of whether they do it, just charge the difference when it is done."

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

This is Capitalism 101 my friend. Don't go to those places. They'll kill themselves off or adjust. As an exercise to the student, explain why you have to give such cretinous establishments your money.

As to voluntary tips, funny thing, you only see consumers complaining, never the wait staff. Worked at a payroll firm that serviced several local restaurants and brother, some of those people make bank.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You know what's way, way more effective than the invisible hand of the "free" market? Regulation. Hidden fees at restaurants are almost non-existent here in Australia, and if you ever encounter one, because it's illegal, you can just not pay it, what are they gonna do? And so the business either quickly stops doing it, or they end up with a fine from the ACCC 🤗

Also, as a former cafe employee, let me tell ya, I was much happier being paid a guaranteed wage than relying on tips. Which for morality's sake, is practically another hidden fee.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So not giving such places money is a non-option?

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It's called a hidden fee for a reason, it's hidden from you. So, yeah, it's a non-option for first time patrons.

Why are you defending these business? Inb4 you say, I'm not, but the free market will correct this! The "free" market clearly isn't, because we're talking about it right now lol, hidden fees are common place in many places in the US.

And regulation (in Australia, for this issue), clearly IS working, because this is practically unheard of here.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They'd be complaining if people actually treated tips as voluntary. Everyone knows you're breaking the social contract if you don't tip.