Green Energy

2226 readers

26 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

SteveKLord@slrpnk.net

Is the dream of nuclear fusion dead? (www.motherjones.com)

submitted 3 months ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] keepthepace@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

ITER does not aim at being a power plant. Its heat is directed at cooling towers with no turbines. The first fusion power plant is supposed to be DEMO which is supposed to start producing electricity by 2050.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

DEMO is not a singular reactor, but rather a class of reactors that are expected to be built using the technologies and lessons learned from ITER. So basically ITER's main goal is to be a massive international R&D project to pave the the way for individual countries to be able to build their own DEMO plants afterwards. Pathfinding manufacturing technologies for this unique of a system is a big part of why ITER is so expensive. Replicating an ITER like machine should be considerably cheaper.

Although I personally wouldn't be suprised if commwealth fusion systems SPARC/ARC leapfrogs ITER/DEMO. Unlike a lot of fusion startups, their approach isn't particularly novel, which means there shouldn't be major physics surprises. The higher field intensity afforded by REBCO should mean much smaller and cheaper machines.