this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
122 points (99.2% liked)

Antiwork

8271 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
uthredii@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
yogthos@lemmy.ml
122
The Guardian view on ‘unretirement’: older workers could help with labour shortages (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by meejle@lemmy.world to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

💀💀💀

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it's objectively absurd to look at a 40-year old policy and try not to acknowledge that it's been adopted by the Democratic Party.

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a story about the UK...

Your point makes slightly more sense if you're talking about the US instead. I still think it's silly to ascribe equal blame to the instigators of the idea and a party that fails to push the tide the other way because of inertia and political expediency.

I mean the centre ground if fucked over there, so you have my sympathy.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I was talking about the US.

It's not inertia, though. The Dems have had the power to make meaningful change several times in the past four decades. Their failure to do so is a choice they've made repeatedly.