Firefox

20333 readers

131 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

145

EFF Says Mozilla's PPA is better than Google's Solution (www.fastcompany.com)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by astro_ray@lemdro.id to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mozilla’s system only measures the success rate of ads—it doesn’t help companies target those ads—and it’s less susceptible to abuse, EFF’s Lena Cohen told @FastCompany@flipboard.com. “It’s much more privacy-preserving than Google’s version of the same feature.”

https://mastodon.social/@eff/112922761259324925

Privacy experts say the new toggle is mostly harmless, but Firefox users saw it as a betrayal.

“They made this technology for advertisers, specifically,” says Jonah Aragon, founder of the Privacy Guides website. “There’s no direct benefit to the user in creating this. It’s software that only serves a party other than the user.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The biggest issue I have with this is that it is opt out

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't be a very useful metric if no one had it on lol

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

deleted by creator

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

That is a very anticonsumer and user freedom mentality.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 11 months ago

Sure but it's the reason why

[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Other big issue is they didn't consult the Open source community. They could've been just straight with us and told us that donations aren't cutting it and then community as a whole could've come up with something to monetize. And even if it ends up being advertising they could've worked with community to implement in such a way that it would respect the try reason why most people switch to Firefox to escape Google's surveillance. And maybe I can stop daydreaming about an utopia

[–] heftig@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It was never about money. This feature isn't and was never going to make Mozilla one cent.

It's about reducing the leverage advertisers have on legislators when it comes to the measurements necessary to operate effective ad campaigns. The hope is that with privacy-preserving methods available, privacy-violating measurement can be more easily outlawed.

I think we would have arrived at the very same feature.