this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
394 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

34886 readers
16 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I personally am fine with this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] library_napper@monyet.cc -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] subtext@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Is it less secure than it could be? Yes.

Is it better than no 2FA? Also yes.

In the end if it doesn’t work for your security model, than more power to you. But if it helps to increase the security of the average Joe, it’s good advice.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Allowing a smartphone access to anything sensitive is even worse advice. Smartphones are notoriously insecure.

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 1 points 1 year ago

You're right. Dont grant your smartphone access to your GitHub. Just give it one factor.