this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
24 points (65.0% liked)

Psychology

354 readers
1 users here now

Come talk about psychology and related disciplines.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
24
The Dunning-Kruger effect is not real (economicsfromthetopdown.com)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by rimu@piefed.social to c/psychology@lemmy.world
 

Have you heard of the ‘Dunning-Kruger effect’? It’s the (apparent) tendency for unskilled people to overestimate their competence. Discovered in 1999 by psychologists Justin Kruger and David Dunning, the effect has since become famous.

Except there’s a problem.

The Dunning-Kruger effect also emerges from data in which it shouldn’t. For instance, if you carefully craft random data so that it does not contain a Dunning-Kruger effect, you will still find the effect. The reason turns out to be embarrassingly simple: the Dunning-Kruger effect has nothing to do with human psychology.1 It is a statistical artifact — a stunning example of autocorrelation.

EDIT: see response from dustyData and the article they linked to https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/dunning-kruger-effect-and-its-discontents

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago