New York Times gift articles

558 readers

54 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Only post New York Times gift article links.

Info:

The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
“Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.

Tip:

Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

baltakatei@sopuli.xyz

[MISLEADING TITLE] Trump Agrees to a Fox News Debate With Harris on Sept. 4 (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by baltakatei@sopuli.xyz to c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Dated: 2024-08-03. Added: 2024-08-03. Edit: Gift link added. Edit (2024-08-04): The New York Times altered the title from “Trump Agrees to a Fox News Debate With Harris on Sept. 4” to “Trump Proposes a Fox News Debate With Harris on Sept. 4” to “Trump Cancels a Debate With Harris on ABC News and Pitches One With Fox News Instead”, presumably because the original misleadingly implied agreement with and consent from Kamala Harris for the change in venue (ABC News to Fox News).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not so sure. You're right that nobody "debates" Trump, but you do get to get onstage and launch attacks at him if you're smooth and know what you're doing.

Fox being the venue is a little meh though, I agree the questions will probably have a strong slant.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The questions would have a slant like a sheer fucking cliff. The audience would be hand picked by MAGA, Inc. There would be absolutely no gain to a "debate" on fox "news".

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Usually things like audience representation and format are negotiated by the two campaigns before the debate is fully agreed to.

I think it's a rare chance to reach the Fox audience with things they don't often encounter due to their media bubbles.