this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
277 points (97.3% liked)
Boston, MA
1093 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to c/boston,
A community for all things related to Boston, Massachusetts. Whether you're a local, a visitor, or just interested in the city, this is the place to discuss, share, and connect with fellow Bostonians.
Greater Boston area discussion is welcome here.
Rules:
Be respectful: Treat others with respect and courtesy. Personal attacks, trolling, and harassment will not be tolerated.
Stay on topic: Keep discussions relevant to Boston and its surrounding areas.
Official City of Boston Website
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
via Axios' brief article covering this.
The moratorium exists for a reason, and if the bench is already dedicated to another person, it would be disrespectful to ignore that. Those things shouldn’t be dismissed as “red tape”.
(I’m arguing with the wording of the article, not you personally, OP.)
👍 Appreciated.
What is that? I'm not seeing anything about a moratorium in this article...
I don’t know the reason, but I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt. Presumably, that law was passed because people thought it was necessary.
It's linked in the top level comment of the OP you're replying to
It’s in the article @ElfWord linked in their comment - the comment you are replying to is replying to them.
That article doesn't say anything about the moratorium except that it exists. My question was why it exists
Probably because it already has a lot of memorials and, having been there, does not have a lot of space to add more without turning it from a functional park to an outside museum. There are a lot of historical public spaces in Boston that are unable to function as anything besides a tourist spot due to that. Bostonians still exist and need green spaces to live and play.
That’s fair. I was responding to the bit where you said you didn’t see it.
As for the why - no idea, honestly.
Then again having a well known figure there would attract more visitors, who would then notice the bench dedication. It's a question of if William's tribute would add or take away from that person's, and the area in general.
I agree. It's not like if the gardens were commemorating someone there couldn't also me other memorials within it. If it's don't respectfully, I dont think there should be a issue.
Hmm at first glance maybe Damon needs to consider that the thought is very nice but maybe isn’t the right call.
If I recall correctly there is already a bench dedicated to the film in the garden, can we just upgrade that one?
Edit: