this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
1109 points (96.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5726 readers
1572 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Shapillon@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Competing by sex is pretty pointless.

It is true that the average male human has some physical advantages on the average female human.

Otoh the variability amongst people of the same sex is wider than that average difference. This effect is reinforced in professional sports because it tends to attract outliers.

And then for trans athletes, most of that difference gets smoothed by a well adjusted HRT applied fpr a few years.

We have divided a bunch of sports into "open class" and "women only" (some sports use "men only" and "women only") because the difference between men and women is large enough that

  1. Women would be unable to compete at a professional level otherwise

  2. A lot of sports would be directly dangerous for women (see: contact sports without weight classes)

Nobody argues that it's pointless to have weight classes. How is that different from having classes based on (a proxy for) levels of testosterone?

One of the best male 1500m runners today, Jacob Ingebritsen, beat the current women's WR by almost 4 seconds when he was 15 years old. Women can be amazing athletes, and watching women compete at the top level is amazing. That's why we need a class where they can compete, just like we need weight classes in many sports.