this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
435 points (98.2% liked)

News

23311 readers
3556 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The event was combative from the start as Trump and three moderators from the National Association of Black Journalists sparred throughout.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ race took center stage in a combative back-and-forth exchange with former President Donald Trump during a panel discussion Wednesday at a gathering of Black journalists in Chicago. 

“I did not know she was Black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn Black and now wants to be known as Black,” Trump said.

“I respect either one," he added, "but she obviously doesn't, because she was Indian all the way, and then all of a sudden, she made a turn and she went she became Black. ... Somebody should look into that too.”

It was in response to a question about the appropriateness of some Republicans saying Harris is a “DEI hire,” a term referring to workplace policies promoting "diversity, equity and inclusion." It has increasingly been used by some on the right to discredit people of colorwith opposing political views.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I assure you, it does not mean "neurodivergent" and most neurodivergent people are not narcissistic. However, capitalism, isolation, insecurity (advertising), lack of community, hyperindividualism, all creates a good recipe for creating a nation of narcissistic people. And so we get lots of flavors:

-intellectual narcissists: only "smart" people are valid, and they determine who and what are smart ofc as if it was objective.

-moral narcissists: super common, only "moral" position is theirs, they are an extremely good person in their eyes and a savior who must give "help" and "advice"

-financial narcissists: don't even need to be rich, just have to feel superior to people poorer than themselves. Tons of them monitor homeless people to an EXTREMELY CREEPY level and may even involve some moral narcissism by claiming the homeless are all bad people who steal, or physical narcissism by claiming all homeless are drug addicts

-physical narcissists: lots of varieties

--weight narcissists: feel superior based on their weight compared to others. Whether that's being big or little.

--physical competency narcissists: often have phobias about physical disability, often will excessively loft and may even abuse steroids or other drugs to be in "perfect" health

--beauty narcissists: see The Picture of Dorian Gray, think of people who will only associate with other beautiful people (and for a bonus game, think of how these types of narcissists pay for programs that are basically eugenics along these parameters - the Olympics, modeling, beauty pageants, actors amd actresses, MENSA, churches, etc - they all try to fish for people with good genes so they can live vicariously through their child, a life free of shame and uncomfortable emotions. ).

--racial narcissists: white supremacists, other racial superiority groups

--gender narcissists: incels, misogynists, transphobes

Look for things like:

  1. an inability to perspective take, can't agree to disagree
  2. demand for perfectionism. Their version of "perfect" is based on value statements, not anything actually measurable or achievable (so they can always keep you striving).
  3. Sensitive to shame and jealousy
  4. Entitled, controlling

So eg a parent who is a gender narcissist (to use the term loosely) like Elon Musk will react by

  1. ignoring the other person's wants, concerns, thoughts
  2. demand their kid be "perfect" to Elon's standards (which will never be achievable- there will always be another demand)
  3. Use their kids as a proxy to enact their shame through, get wildly jealous when their kids surpass the shame they feel because they themselves can't escape it. Meaning, Elon feels shame and jealousy that his daughter did what he could never do - endure the "shame" of being trans.
  4. He thinks it's appropriate to force her and others to be cis, and he tries to publicly shame her (he thinks everyone is sensitive to shame like he is, bc he can't perspective take) to force her into good behavior

The formula becomes quite clear and predictable once you understand what's happening. That's VERY different than someone with low serotonin counting tiles over and over again, or someone with a panic attack crying from fear. Partially because it's a series of beliefs that can theoretically be unlearned over time. There's no medication for it because it's like learning a language incorrectly - how can you make someone forget a whole language with a drug? You can't, you just start where they are at and teach them as much as they can learn and WANT to learn, each day. This is the impact individuals have on culture.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hey look it's pseudoscience. Also your username appropriates Austronesian culture disrespectfully. Makes sense. Bigots in one area tend to be problematic in other ways.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

How does it appropriate Austronesian culture disrespectfully? It's a childhood nickname and not related to the concept of Mana in video games.

Can you define pseudoscience and explain how that definition applies to the field of psychology?

Do you think morality is objective or subjective?

[–] HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You fell for their distraction. They disregarded your argument, then attacked you so that you would defend yourself.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Maybe if I was bad at arguing. But if they answer the questions I've given them, I have another point that confirms my argument quite nicely. That they haven't answered is likely because they see the trap and want to avoid it. They gave up. That's fine, I still won the argument if they withdraw.