this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
86 points (92.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8256 readers
843 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (9 children)

The concept mouse that Faber examined was "a little heavier" than the typical mouse. But what drives its longevity potential for Logitech is the idea of constantly updated software and services.

What software or service updates does a mouse even need?

Like, the crazier mice have software, but it doesn't really need updated. It's just for fine tuning DPI and turning off the flashy lights.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.org 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mainly wonder how they are going to solve a broken microswitch with a software update...

[–] Jajcus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When you pay them as long as you use the mouse, they have a business reason to keep it working as long as possible (so to use batter switches) and sending you a new one when one breaks can still be profitable for them. Software updates are less important here.

I guess for end users it will still be cheaper and more convenient to buy a new regular mouse with a one-time payment after the previous one breaks. And that is how electro-trash piles up...

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 6 points 1 month ago

There is a lesson in there about how we get stupid outcomes from "capitalism"

load more comments (6 replies)