this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
751 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

59342 readers
5242 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A sample is a fundamental part of a song’s output, not just its input. If LLMs are changing the input’s work to a high enough degree is it not protected as a transformative work?

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it's more like a collage of everyone's words. it doesn't make anything creative because ot doesn't have a body or life or real social inputs you could say. basically it's just rearranging other people's words.

A song that's nothing but samples. but so many samples it hides that fact. this is my view anyway.

and only a handful of people are getting rich of the outputs.

if we were in some kinda post capitalism economy or if we had UBI it wouldn't bother me really. it's not the artists ego I'm sticking up for, but their livelihood