this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
1043 points (98.5% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5674 readers
825 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Anticorp@lemmy.world
1043
Nah, not worth the trouble (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/funny@lemmy.world
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is not a good look for privacy.com. You have to be either very lazy to not set up the redirect, or use a very cheap service that doesn't allow you to do it.

[–] Glitchington@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it's just ensuring SSL encryption to their servers at all times. It's the best possible look for a website called privacy.com. If they allowed http connections, those connections aren't guaranteed to be private (encrypted).

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm talking about leaving http://privacy.com (the non-secured version) not leading anywhere. It's an amateur move.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Right. I don't feel like trusting my CC information to a company that doesn't even know how to do a redirect.