this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
432 points (100.0% liked)

196

16477 readers
2496 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

These aren't commie blocks, and they usually aren't replacing single family homes. They're most problematic when replacing older multi unit buildings, because they're taking low income housing and replacing it with housing only upper income people can afford (plus a couple low income units to say that they're trying). And they get tax breaks to do this gentrification, after years of neglecting the upkeep on the older buildings it's replacing.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 34 points 3 months ago

Okay, I can get on board with saying fuck gentrification. But we need to be building a hell of a lot more of these than yet another shitty tract of single family homes just a few minutes' drive from the stroad to take you to big box mart.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 months ago

You're not wrong. And to add to that the stupid building codes that lead to the type of small 500 sq ft condo unit with only one wall with windows and no air circulation. This article covers that well.

But all these condos, not only are they not human-sized and lack air cicrulation, most of them are fitted with luxury features to up the price beyond what regular folks can pay and don't leave any room for social housing.

There should be a law for mandatory social housing in these constructions.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They knocked down my neighborhood’s lower income grocery store to put up three on the one lot. Fuck these monstrosities.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 19 points 3 months ago

The right way to do this was to have the entire lower floor become the grocery store and build sound proof residences over it.