this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
658 points (97.4% liked)
Technology
59651 readers
2634 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Try duckduckgo
DuckDuckGo also uses Bing under the hood.
Yes, duckduckgo uses other search engines to provide its results. Your point?
I don't care where duckduckgo gets the links from, I care how relevant the top links are and that they aren't being crowded out by ads.
No need to be defensive, ddg uses bing which means it is part of the big five under the hood. That always will have certain ramifications in the long run.
I also use it but I am looking for decentralised alternatives in meantime not because ddg is bad but because sooner or later it will get worse.
Also why are you so aggressive anyway, it’s super weird and doesn’t fit Lemmy
Bing by any other name is still bing.
Edit: Awww some people either don't know or don't like that bing is what duckduckgo is. https://www.tomshardware.com/software/search-engines/microsoft-suffering-from-outage-bing-copilot-and-duckduckgo-inaccessible-for-several-hours
At best this is as intelligent as saying Google Maps is YouTube by another name because they're both on Google servers. Even that would be smarter to say actually, because Google Maps and YouTube are owned by the same company.
When bing goes down so does duckduckgo but somehow your apples to oranges argument is somehow comparative to you.
They share hosting servers, that doesn't make them the same service. When the power goes out do you think you and your neighbors live in the same house?
Just keep sucking down the hype. They don't share the same hosting for the frontend but they both use the same backend. The backend is of course owned by microsoft. duckduckgo uses bings backend and somehow you have convinced yourself beyond all evidence to the contray that it isn't bing with a different wrapper.
When you can't pay Stardew Valley (because Steam is down) you also can't play Eldenring. They must use the same backend and Eldenring is just Stardew Valley by another name.
You're going to need a better source than "they go down at the same time".
You are not getting it. Its a documented fact that duckduckgo uses bing search. You keep coming up with these other poor examples when its acknowledged by duckduckgo that they use bing. Of course they say they are more than bing but in the end that is just hype. This probably wont convince you since you are not looking for answers
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/05/bing-outage-shows-just-how-little-competition-google-search-really-has/
This is because the company uses Microsoft's Bing to power its search results.
From this article https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/duckduckgo-what-to-know-about-google-searchs-privacy-focused-rival/
https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2019/11/19/who-uses-bing-anyway Look at number 5.
Of course all these sources could be wrong and its just you who is right. Right?
Laters
You act like this is some secret they keep, they literally tell you on their website that Bing is one of their sources: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/
You've exposed nothing. I don't care how they source it, I care how they deliver it.
No I don't I'm just aware. Its not one of their sources it is their source. I frankly don't understand why you have such a issue with this fact.
Goodbye.
I don't know why you're arguing with me, I use words from the dictionary so you're basically just arguing with the dictionary by another name.