World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Germany stopped weapons exports to Israel. No official policy change they're keeping it quiet but the federal government isn't issuing any export permissions any more.
No we didn't. Scholz just said so yesterday.
https://www.handelsblatt.com/dpa/scholz-behaelt-sich-deutsche-waffenlieferungen-an-israel-vor/29912098.html
As I said: No official policy change. Not ruling something out is not the same as actually doing it.
Germany stopped weapons exports before Nicaragua brought its case to the ICJ, the last salient shipment were 2000 PzF a week or two after the attacks. You need to read between the lines here, Germany neither wants to be complicit nor give more moderate Israelis -- like, say, Gantz, I can't believe I'm calling him moderate -- the impression that it has abandoned Israel.
Scholz was pressured for a statement and, with his absolutely stellar skill in waffling, said nothing of any consequence. Are we, in the future, going to ship weapons to Israel? I think so, and I don't think Scholz lied when he said exactly that. But doing that before Netanyahu and his goons are ousted? I'd be surprised, at least half the republic would be up in arms, the coalition would likely break apart, it's the kind of thing that can easily bring down a government. And for what, just to have courts double-check the permits and decide that they can't be issued legally? Nah. Even if they wanted to, they wouldn't try.
Please do you have sources to back up your claims that none have been shipped since around October? I don't want to sound like I'm trying to disprove you but would like to use and see the sources myself.
It would've been all over the news and there would've been blood on the streets. Or at least tear gas.
Where's your source on that?
Here's mine from yesterday, claiming literally the opposite.
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/german-chancellor-vows-to-continue-arms-deliveries-to-israel/3284468
There's even a video interview of Scholz, where he was asked about delivering weapons to Israel (which I cannot find ad hoc)
The ICJ, for one.
Not ruling something out and doing something are completely different things. For more, see my reply to the sibling comment.
What did they say? Unless serious actions are taken, their words don't mean shit.
Here's an exhaustive overview of the case so far with tons of links.
The courts words are, paraphrasing the gist, "Germany has export controls in place sufficient to avoid what Nicaragua accused it of, there are no signs that it's not actually sticking to them, as such we don't see any need to order Germany to do anything".