this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
942 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

20785 readers
517 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

OC please steal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vuraniute@thelemmy.club 85 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not only TiVO, IIRC Tecno (the phone company) is in violation of the GPL-2.0 too by not providing device trees.

[–] ipacialsection@startrek.website 73 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tons of companies are shipping Linux without giving users access to the source code, it's just that only one has the term "Tivoization" named after it.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] rbits@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Huh, Linux uses GPLv2? Does anyone have any info about why?

Edit: Found a video https://youtu.be/PaKIZ7gJlRU. Makes sense. Complete freedom to use and modify the software means freedom to use the software in a proprietary device with DRM, as long as you still give the changes to the public.

[–] julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 2 months ago

Thats false! There is already a link to the wikipedia article, but here is the relevant quote: „but uses hardware restrictions or digital rights management (DRM) to prevent users from running modified versions of the software on that hardware.“

It is not a violation of the GPL 2, the license of the Linux kernel, but only the GPL 3 which was basically created for this case. Linus Torvalds is a big defender of the GPL 2 and said that Tivo provided good patches for the hardware they used.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Speaking of violators, North Korea is in violation of GPL 2.0 since they didn't provide me the source code of the kernel when I asked for them for it.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Did you get a kernel binary from them? If not, I don't think they're bound to you by GPL.