Anarchism

1421 readers

127 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

Other anarchist comms

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Defending the country as an anarchist if your country is attacked (lemmy.ml)

submitted 4 months ago by Vincentvd@lemmy.ml to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have been reading a book about the history of Israel. One section was about people refusing to serve the army when Israel fought war in Libanon and Gaza because they didn't agree with cruelties the Israel army conducted/ accepted. It made me think about the other way around: What if your country is attacked and people are being called to service by the army, would an anarchist refuse out of principle?

Quite some anarchist reject the idea of a centralized army so an anarchist might refuse out of principle. On the other hand, your country is being attacked. You can argue that accepting service is accepted because it is different from invading another country because you now have to defend your own country.

What are your thoughts on this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I guess that would highly depend on how the specific national army is managed. In some cases they allow largely independent brigades to be formed. But in most cases, anarchists would probably opt for a more partisan like defense of the places where they live instead of being send to some far away front as cannon fodder.

[–] Brickardo@feddit.nl 5 points 4 months ago

If anything, Spanish civil war showed that there's so much partisanship can do against professionalized armies...