this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

Spaceflight

621 readers
30 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.nz/post/12540146

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Great write up of the basics, thanks for sharing!

Key decision factors for satellite operators when choosing between chemical and electric propulsion: 

  1. Fuel Efficiency
  2. Lost Mission Revenue
  3. Responsiveness
  4. Thrust Requirements
  5. Deorbiting
  6. Upfront Cost
  7. Propellant Availability & Storage
  8. Fine Pointing Maneuvers

Summary 

Electric propulsion is well suited for deep space and long-duration missions because it can generate power for a long time through solar arrays, from a very small amount of propellant. 

But for missions where revenue, responsibility and responsiveness take high priority, chemical propulsion systems provide quick orbit insertion, responsible re-entry, and instantaneous thrust and is often the better choice.