this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
30 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

17398 readers
105 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
30
More modern alternative to bittorrent? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by eu8@lemmy.world to c/programming@programming.dev
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello. I remember a long time ago I found some protocol that was boasted as a less out-dated version of bittorrent. I think one of its features was that you could update a whatever-their-equivalent-of-a-torrent-is with small changes and those changes could be seeded.

If this sounds familiar, and you know anything about this, I would really appreciate pointing me in the right direction. Thank you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NatoBoram@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the discovery process is shite on IPFS. You kinda have to cheat it to get it to work with something like .

Idk if it's inefficient with large data, but it's inefficient with compressed storage, as it does block-level deduplication, which is very cool.