this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
709 points (97.2% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2396 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Vance is one of Trump's most vocal supporters and an outspoken critic of U.S. aid to Ukraine.

. . .

Vance has said that it would be "completely irresponsible" for Ukraine to join NATO. He has also argued for the U.S. to focus solely on preventing Chinese expansion, even if that means sacrificing sovereign Ukrainian lands to Russia.

"Any peace settlement is going to require some significant territorial concessions from Ukraine, and you're gonna have a peace deal, because that's the only way out of the conflict," Vance said in February.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thats the propaganda version. Why did russia invade Georgia? (Hint: its the same reason they invaded Ukraine)

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that's what I said, russian expansionism.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Gotcha, I can explain it to you. Russia believes that NATO expansion toward them is an extential threat to their existence. NATO and the US know this, and know that NATO membership of the countries like Ukraine and Georgia is unacceptable. So when Georgia was going in the direction of NATO, then russia invaded a couple months later. So then when Ukraine was going in the direction of NATO membership, russia invaded. You can disagree with their reasons, but that is their reasons not some bullshit claim that Russia is the next 1930s germany.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

These places should be part of our sphere of influence and we dont like them drifting elsewhere is exactly the reason for Hitler taking over Austria, then the Sudetenland, then Danzig. Its very comparable, down the the presense of ethnic Germans/Russians being present in the Sudetenland/Donbas and them needing to be "protected" being offered as an excuse.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

One other given reason that people seem to forget is the published position by Putin that Ukraine is a fiction, that Ukranians don't exist in a culturally distinct way, and that their claimed history and distinctness should be erased and made properly Russian.

It's not just imperialism at that point, it's genocidal.

[–] FreeFacts@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, Nato did expand toward them, Sweden and Finland, and what did Russia do? Did they immediately start strengthening their defences against these new Nato countries? Nope, on the contrary, the baltic bases are near empty of forces. It is concrete proof that Russia does not see Nato as a real threat, they know fully well that Nato will not be the aggressor. The whole Nato expansion excuse is the propaganda, and you are eating it.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

They probably do feel threatened also by those countries, but not the same as Ukraine and Georgia. And they are doing the most they can do. Where do you think this ends? Nuclear war? Why do you suddenly care about a shitty corrupt country like Ukraine?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hey! These countries want to be grouped together to defend against my expansionism! Better invade them to stop them from grouping together, halting my ambitions to get the band back together! Nato is a defensive agreement after all.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can not like their beliefs, but this was was completely avoidable, and the idea that russia invaded Ukraine and Georgia due to expansionism is a lie, and the people telling you this are aware it a lie.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, if russia didn't want to expand it's territory, it would have been avoided. However that's not the case, it's not a lie. Why would countries join a defensive pact around russia if russia wasn't eyeballing their territory?

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You are just repeating the propaganda talking points. NATO knew that it was the reddest of red lines, and they did it anyways. You can not like it, but its the known consequence of the action.

You should be asking; why would NATO take a completely unnecessary action that would cause a war. But I guess if you keep looking at russia, then you wont think about what is happening.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You are just repeating the propaganda talking points. russia knew that it was the reddest of red lines, and they did it anyways. You can not like it, but its the known consequence of the action.

You should be asking; why would russia take a completely unnecessary action that would cause a war. But I guess if you keep looking at NATO, then you wont think about what is happening.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Uh.... this is not the kind of statement you can just switch the names on and it makes sense...

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It absolutely is. In fact it makes sense when I switched it. You are minimizing the death and destruction that russia, and russia alone is causing to Ukraine. You are blaming nato, a defensive alliance, meant to keep each other safe from russian/warsaw countries aggression. The only country that is to blame for the war is russia. And to suggest otherwise is an insult to the people who are fighting for their right not to be oppressed by putin and his cronies.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nope... It doesnt make sense.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

[–] kevindqc@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What did the US do when the soviet union was going to put missles in Cuba?