this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
874 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

5189 readers
1718 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
874
Sizing pants: men's vs women's (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
113 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sigh_Bafanada@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The opposite issue for me: Big ass, big thighs, short legs.

I've given up and now I tend to just buy women's pants.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That is better than the opposite. You can have your pants hemmed and taken in where required. It is harder to add material.

I feel like people these days don't utilize tailors enough. You can improve a lot of off the rack clothing.

[–] Sigh_Bafanada@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah I think you're right, I have more options to go for. But still, to have standard leg sizes...

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But... but women's pants don't have any room in the crotch.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

Skill issue tbh

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Doesn't seem to be a problem for OP. 😜