People Twitter

5189 readers

1718 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

874

Sizing pants: men's vs women's (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

113 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 78 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Nah. Mens pants sizes are just as wild and wrong as womens sizes.

Its vanity sizing, everywhere

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 3 months ago

I struggled to fit in a size 34 a while ago.

Slightly more expensive brand, I fit in 34 just fine. So in my mind I still have a 34" waist.

I do not.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I went to get a couple of pairs of jeans from a Plato's closet recently. I tried 6 pairs of different brand jeans, all 34/32. 4 pairs didn't clear my thighs, 1 couldn't button, the last fit. The cut of the jeans makes those numbers mean very different things..

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cut is part of it, but they literally aren't consistent about the length of the cloth, even with the same number shown.

"Boot cut" or "skinny" 34 waist from every single brand will differ, even if the cut was exactly the same.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I hate it