this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
318 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59300 readers
4940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s a very poor attempt by people who don’t know how to use the technology to regulate it. Ask anyone who actually knows how to ever restart their Wi-Fi how they would protect “the kids” and they can come up with better ideas

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One more reason we would do better with specialists for each field being responsible for the laws regarding said field, with some kind of synthesist organizing. It doesn't have to be a technocracy, we could do it democratically, but we can't keep going with these 70 year old politicians trying to make laws for things they can even define let alone understand.

[–] Spotlight7573@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The least they could do is bring back the Office of Technology Assessment to help them understand things:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Technology_Assessment

[–] Melpomene@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thing is, I think they understand it well enough. This is never, ever about safety and is 100% always about control. They continue to push these bills because they want to chill anonymous speech and destroy privacy protections and they'll keep doing so until they get their way or are voted out.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think Hanlons razor is apt here: never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's a simple idea, require all sites that kids access to have a second email address that gives access to chat logs, so that concerned parents can know what their kids get up to, and smart kids can route around the issue.

[–] nofunberg@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The challenge there is that in situations with abusive parents the kid is in even more danger.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Smart kids just sign up with two of their own email addresses, but yeah, abusive controlling parents will always be an issue. They're an issue without the internet. Adding internet to it doesn't turn non-abusive people into assholes, it just lets them attack their children from a new angle.

What I'm saying is, you cannot fix abusive parents without using CPS. The real answer to abuse is giving kids more tools to report it.

[–] nofunberg@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Right, but if a young child is unaware of this and they reach out for help on a monitored platform they’re gonna find themselves in an even worse situation.