this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
140 points (95.5% liked)
Excellent Reads
1510 readers
6 users here now
Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.
Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.
Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.
Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.
Rules:
- Common Sense. Civility, etc.
- Server rules.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It doesn't sound like she's living well knowing she could have protected Kimi but had decided she was too afraid to not have a loaded and ready to fire gun.
She's blaming the kid instead of herself or her husband.
The kid didn't place a loaded gun in the car.
I'm having trouble understanding the purpose of this clarification. I don't think anything I said disagrees with anything you said.
It's not a clarification, it's an addendum. I didn't disagree, but thought it makes your point even more wild that she would only have troubles not blaming her child and god, instead of looking at her own fault. (to the work out the guilt with a therapist. It's still a tragedy)