this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
232 points (93.6% liked)

Greentext

4292 readers
897 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] embed_me@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't consent imply the absence of exploitative forces?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

exploitation and consent are unrelated. I exploit water resources every day, and consent is an absurd topic to raise in this context. the definition of veganism requires the abstention from exploitation of animals for food. there is no exemption made for consenting animals

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Exploit does mean "use/utilize" but I assumed the common subtext of "use unfairly or in a manner not conducive to overall welfare"

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

the ambiguity does not seem to be helpful in defining veganism, and the definition should probably be updated

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The way that people use the word "exploit" when talking about living things is different from the way we use it when talking about nonliving things. It implies a lack of consent from the one being exploited.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

consenting exploitation is still exploitation.