Excellent Reads

1463 readers

1 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Rules:

Common Sense. Civility, etc.
Server rules.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Iliveonsaturdays@sh.itjust.works

awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com

AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works

119

Denied by AI: How Medicare Advantage plans use algorithms to cut off care for seniors in need (archive.ph)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/longreads@sh.itjust.works

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is part 1 of an ongoing investigative series.

An algorithm, not a doctor, predicted a rapid recovery for Frances Walter, an 85-year-old Wisconsin woman with a shattered left shoulder and an allergy to pain medicine. In 16.6 days, it estimated, she would be ready to leave her nursing home.

On the 17th day, her Medicare Advantage insurer, Security Health Plan, followed the algorithm and cut off payment for her care, concluding she was ready to return to the apartment where she lived alone. Meanwhile, medical notes in June 2019 showed Walter’s pain was maxing out the scales and that she could not dress herself, go to the bathroom, or even push a walker without help.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 1800doctorb@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is one of the most annoying (dangerous in this case) trends of the AI rush. It has potential for incredible value, but that only depends on the people instituting it and the structures they have in place to ensure it’s successful.

I could see a world where the algorithm could receive input on the patients condition each day and modify its recommendations on that; like a Bayesian inference model. But that requires a statistician with some careful thought to set it all up, and executives wouldn’t be able to reduce headcount by several dozen because some guy sold them a black box that solves all their problems.

[–] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

depends on the people instituting it and the structures they have in place to ensure it’s successful.

Oh I'm pretty sure THEY view it as a success. Old folks with large medical bills dying? That's a feature, not a bug.