this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
159 points (98.8% liked)

UK Politics

3091 readers
71 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's time to see if the polls are right.

Previously: the voting megathread

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Peter Mandelson? I think he had a point in that Starmer has changed the party from unelectable with Corbyn (which sadly, they were) to a more than realistic prospect for a sensible alternative to the Tories.

You're right of course that the Conservatives have utterly fucked the pooch (not to mention the country) but Starmer has nonetheless made a massive change in making the party palatable to many, many more people (not that I personally agree with quite a lot of his policies and policy reversals)

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

That's a fair take, and yes it was Mandelson.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Interestingly, Labour have less of the vote (proportionaly) than when Corbyn was at the helm.

[–] Theme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

I agree, and I do infinitely prefer Corbyn. I didn't vote Labour this time. I think the nuance here is that Corbyn motivated Tory voters to vote against him, whereas Starmer was less threatening to them, so they didn't worry so much about vote splitting or staying home