this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
1188 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2616 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“(With) today’s Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed. For all practical purposes, there are virtually no limits on what the president can do. It’s a fundamentally new principle and it’s a dangerous precedent because the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law even including the supreme court of the United States.”

Throughout his address, Biden underscored the gravity of the moment, emphasizing that the only barrier to the president’s authority now lies in the personal restraint of the officeholder. He warned vehemently against the prospect of Trump returning to power, painting a stark picture of the dangers such an outcome could pose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He doesn't. Impeaching judges is the House's job.

You know your house rep is up for election this year?

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but now he's above the law, so I say do it anyway and overturn the ruling his damn self.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Legally .. but the law doesn't apply to the president so long as they're doing it for a reason they believe to be official.

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The ruling more or less explicitly states that Biden could go on national television, say "Won't someone rid me of these troublesome justices?", have them assassinated, and face no legal repercussions because using the bully pulpit is covered by presidential immunity

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Farther. He could use the military or any branch of government to kill them and still get immunity. We now have a long, don't get me wrong we always had some assumption that that's how it went but seeing it on paper is an eye opener.

Hell, he could sign literally every US asset over to anyone he pleases and there's nothing we could do via a legal means. It's not supposed to work that way but if no law constrains the office then the office is simply free to do literally whatever they want.

[–] Akuden@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The law applies to the president always.

Here is what this ruling is for -

First - if I order an enemy of the US dead I can be prosecuted.

The president orders an enemy dead. That enemy is killed. The president cannot be prosecuted for that act.

What this ruling does - the president may also not be prosecuted for that act after they leave office.

That's all this does. That's it. If the president kills a maid in the White House he or she will go to prison because that is against the law and not within the duties of the office.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It doesnt.

Nope.

Agreed.

No or means they can't be prosecuted for it ever so long as it was under the guise of an official act.

Nope, that maid was a spy and deserved what she got.