this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
1188 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2616 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“(With) today’s Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed. For all practical purposes, there are virtually no limits on what the president can do. It’s a fundamentally new principle and it’s a dangerous precedent because the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law even including the supreme court of the United States.”

Throughout his address, Biden underscored the gravity of the moment, emphasizing that the only barrier to the president’s authority now lies in the personal restraint of the officeholder. He warned vehemently against the prospect of Trump returning to power, painting a stark picture of the dangers such an outcome could pose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It doesn't have to be an executive order, he's in charge of the military. Any command he gives them is an official act, and can't be questioned now.

And then he can pardon them as they don't have the same immunity as he now has. Pardons are also official acts.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Only for federal crimes, but that covers most things involving the military anyway

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Ah, good point.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Also, I'm not sure being pardoned has an impact on if they can be discharged for following an order that a tribunal disagrees with. They might not end up in jail, but it could be the end of their military career