this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19527 readers
3 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://rabbitea.rs/post/280182

I think this is appropriate here!

‘I am a self-expressive person and I feel very confident with pink hair so I came up with a solution to keep the job and my hair’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UmbrellAssassin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure there was a dress code when she signed up for the job. She agreed to it. Instead of realizing how childish she's acting, she just doubles down and whines on the internet. Really a snapshot of people these days.

[–] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These expectations are the problem, if I agreed to sell my soul because I didn't want to read a several page agreement while installing a free program, should they get it? Fuck no. Also, as somebody who's worked all sorts of different positions: these rules are unenforceable, in a lot of cases. If a business hires you, they will try to keep that asset. A lot of times managers do not care what you wear until you're someone they don't like. Especially if you work in food service, and make a standard industry wage (that is, not shit!!) Push that envelope. Your coworkers will too, maybe.

[–] NatoBoram@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A job shouldn't force you to modify your body in any capacity

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can I be full on nudist then?

fwiw I think pink hair should be perfectly fine but there are some rules with dress that are a good idea. I don't care if you wear a dress, slacks or have rainbow hair but generally I prefer people I do business with to wear stuff.

Then there's food safety. Things like hair nets and prohibiting certain jewelry and outfits in food processing plants is another example of when sometimes it's ok to limit personal expression for the sake of others'. A server though? No such reason. Maybe a hair net if they brought food to your table or were also a chef.

[–] LegionEris@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally none of the things you listed here count as modifying your body? As a reply to "nobody should have to arbitrarily change their body for their employer," "sometimes there are practical clothing and equipment requirements" is practically a non-sequitur.

[–] xietbrix@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is cool, except the subject of this entire thread has nothing to do with modifying body parts so it's also fair for the responder to be referring to attire rather than actual body modification.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, would you let your boss shave your head because that was the 'dress code'?

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

That is exactly what happens when one enlists in the U.S. military. Dress codes are a thing, and legitimate.