this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
453 points (94.9% liked)

Greentext

4470 readers
1244 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 64 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If you know what they’re testing for, it’s not a good test.

[–] joel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 88 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They don't have to tell you the truth. It could have been to test whether being told that it's "men vs women" affects the readings test subjects provide

[–] elvith@feddit.org 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Also they could tell them after completing all tests/finishing ths study.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 16 points 5 months ago

Not could, will. These days it's considered unethical not to debrief explaining any deceptive elements of the study. It can also be valuable because the people conducting the study can use it as a chance to find out if the participants knew about the deception, in case that knowledge might have affected the results.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 4 months ago

if you think you know what they're testing for, you've been lied to.