I fail to see how anything you said was useful in that I already admitted that it would need to be gradual, so you spent a lot of time on an entirely unnecessary analogy and thensome. However, you offered none of that in your initial comment. You just said that capitalism could still work. If there was any misunderstanding, it was on you for not sharing something you expected people to magically already know.

[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No need to get pissy, I was just trying to re-explain myself in a way you'd understand.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no issue with slowly moving toward socialist but I don't think there is much to be gained in protecting capitalism.

That was my reply to you about not needing to be a socialist society to have socialist policies. I clearly understand the principle of gradual change without childish analogies that waste everyone's time. You mention nothing in your comment about gradual change. Simply that we don't need a socialist society. Don't become condescending when people can't read your mind due to your inability to communicate. See how few words I used to discuss gradual change? No need for childish condescension for such a simple idea.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Don't be a dick. You just wasted my time with elitist shit about how smart you are. You mad because they said "don't be pissy"?

Well ya sounded pissy to me, and you're doing an even better job of it now. Be better than that