this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
897 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59342 readers
5137 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
897
The new Chinese owner of the popular Polyfill JS project injects malware into more than 100 thousand sites (sansec.io)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by 0x815@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
116 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archived link

The polyfill.js is a popular open source library to support older browsers. 100K+ sites embed it using the cdn.polyfill.io domain. Notable users are JSTOR, Intuit and World Economic Forum. However, in February this year, a Chinese company bought the domain and the Github account. Since then, this domain was caught injecting malware on mobile devices via any site that embeds cdn.polyfill.io. Any complaints were quickly removed (archive here) from the Github repository.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The malware thing still deserves a headline. They just argue it's stupid so many even have to use the library to begin with.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

Have to use? No one has to use any library. It’s convenience, and in this case it’s literally so they don’t have to write code for older browser versions.

The issue here isn’t that anyone has to use it, it’s the way it was used that is the problem. Directly linking to the current version of the code hosted by a third party instead of hosting a copy yourself.