this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
296 points (93.5% liked)

Selfhosted

39877 readers
355 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
296
Cloudflare is bad. Youre right. (lemm.ee)
submitted 4 months ago by Kuvwert@lemm.ee to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
161 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Centralization is bad for everyone everywhere.

That bring said... I just moved my homeserver to another city... and I plugged in the power, then I plugged in the ethernet, and that was the whole shebang.

Tunnels made it very easy. No port forwarding no dns configuration no firewall fiddling no nothing.

Why do they have to make it so so easy...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nerdschleife@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I use cloud flare tunnel for my home server too. Are there any viable and somewhat easy alternatives?

[–] thefactremains@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

DNS names are restricted to your tailnet’s domain name (node-name.tailnet-name.ts.net)

I guess that's fine for some. Not a compromise I'm willing to make though.

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

As soon as I can use my personal domains with tailscale funnel I'll be switching, I like tail scale a lot

[–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Get a cheap VPS and set up a VPN of your choice.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago

Just make sure the VPS will shut down if the bandwidth is exceeded rather than giving you a big overage charge.

[–] Audalin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Once configured, Tor Hidden Services also just work (you may need to use some fresh bridges in certain countries if ISPs block Tor there though). You don't have to trust any specific third party in this case.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't that be slow?

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

Yes. Very slow. And only accessible from tor clients or tor2web/onion.to-like constructions. Which adds additional delay and errors.

There are things for which onion addresses are the right solution. This is not one of them.

[–] Audalin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

It would. But it's a good option when you have computationally heavy tasks and communication is relatively light.

[–] ANIMATEK@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

DynDNS? I'm not 100% sure what CF Tunnel does, but from my 2 min reading it seems that DynDNS would accomplish what OP described just as well.

[–] f2sfljLhdtTZ@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

It might help to read it once more then 🙂

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Oh, it's way more than what any dyndns can do.

[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 3 points 4 months ago

Port forwards in the router + DynDns.