this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
372 points (93.9% liked)

Science Memes

15832 readers
2061 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Downcount@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And to my knowledge there can't be a before time.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Oh yeah? Then where did they film The Land Before Time? Checkmat

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like how there are at least three things that are immediately recognizable as wrong with this question.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Well, everyone has a skill I guess

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

those are some egregious claims to not have a source.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

Can time really exist if there was no frame of reference to measure it? We can only detect it by motion or entropy. It's the only way of "time". So if there was some point where there was nothing that moved, then time wouldn't exist.

For that matter, there's no way of measuring if time is even consistent. If it were constantly speeding way up, or slowing way down, we'd have no way of knowing.

Time is just a figment of our imagination so we can keep track of movement. Just like magenta isn't a real color.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago
[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, yes and no. Time is a concept derived from a change in state. There is no “real” time. If the universe before the Big Bang existed in a static state, then the concept of time itself becomes meaningless. So in that case, it would be “before time” in a sense

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

The state cannot have been absolutely static - if it was, the big bang would not have occurred, and the same stasis would be existing now, unchanged.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Duh, spacetime is a casual filter.

[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Time is an illusion

It's just a human made concept to create a reference to measure shit

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago

Time is change, and exists whether or not we measure it.

[–] efstajas@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not, time doesn't give a shit about humans, and would happily pass without any conscious observer at all anywhere in the universe.