this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
328 points (98.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6608 readers
419 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Or just fucking offer good an cheap food to your employees in house but thats probably too expensive for the richest developing nation in the world.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It would be the same issue wouldn't it? Instead of the Dominoes guy knowing something is going down it would be the Aramark, or whatever food vendor the Pentagon uses, people getting extra shipments for the additional staff.

[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's a bit easier to vet the contractors working at the Pentagon than it is to vet all the restaurant employees nearby.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Vetting the employees isn't really important when an observer can just watch a higher-than-usual volume of delivery trucks showing up.

[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Freezers and refrigerators exist. Unmarked trucks are an option. The Pentagon has so many vehicles coming and going every day logistics could easily bring in 10x the normal amount of food without any outside observer being aware.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 4 months ago

They have infinite money dude, they can just hire every single person needed for it full time. They could start their own food business and it wouldnt even be noticeable on the spendings.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well the point is more to poison the source of information with bad indicators for anyone watching.

Trying to remove the indicator is one strategy, and it might work partially, but it can also just move the problem somewhere else. To use your example, serving the food in house shifts the problem from takeout delivery to food delivery to the in-house kitchen.

Of course the best strategy would probably be to do both - increase the availability (and quality) of in-house food to encourage its regular use, and also order takeout in large-ish volumes sometimes when nothing is going on.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There’s a (likely apocryphal) story about a country tracking subjects inside the pentagon, and being completely convinced that one building near the center was absolutely the most important in the complex. Every single head of staff, general, admiral, etc would visit the building for 10-20 minutes at a time, so it must be some major communication hub. They devised plans to infiltrate this building, to see what was inside.

It was the coffee shop.

TIL "apocryphal"