this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
572 points (98.8% liked)

World News

32088 readers
850 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wind and sun will always supply a base level of energy.

That is objectively false. The sun doesn't shine at night, and wind doesn't blow 100% of the time. So logically there is some amount of time that you do not get a base load provided only by sun and wind. Hence the need for storage at all. And yes it is a gotcha question, because it's something that anti-nuclear people hand-wave away as if the significant storage infrastructure to support a 100% renewable is just a rounding error, and not worth thinking about.

[โ€“] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I did the calculation for you in a different answer, it isn't as unreasonable as you seem to think. Aside from that:

It's extremely uncommon for the whole powergrid to experience zero wind. That's not happening.

What pro-nuclear people are just waving away is so much more though. Space for storage is nothing in comparison.