Games

16409 readers

940 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

339

Minecraft players outraged as Microsoft deletes accounts that weren't transitioned (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 3 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

161 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And if you bought in alpha, it is for "every future version" of Minecraft. I made it into that group by like a week.

If Microsoft wants to keep profiting off of Minecraft's name, then they are making "future versions" and they need to honour that. They don't want to do that? Okay, call it "shitty block building game rip-off #15,084,831". But they won't, because that name is valuable for good reason.

It would cost them literally nothing and gain massive goodwill to give that out to like the tiny minority of early players, many of whom won't even use it, but something about being a corporation makes it impossible for them to do literally anything good. It's frankly baffling.