Free and Open Source Software

17957 readers

130 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

Signal on Linux (lemmy.today)

submitted 5 months ago by theorangeninja@lemmy.today to c/foss@beehaw.org

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

How is it possible, that Signal still only provides a .deb package and no .rpm, or even better AppImage or Flatpak? There is an unofficial Flatpak but is it secure?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] theorangeninja@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a hacky way to do things, I don't think I'm comfortable with that.

[–] ericjmorey@programming.dev 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Building from source is the opposite of hacky. It's the recommended way to deal with things like this where you are concerned about trust and security. I understand that it's not something you've done before, but it not as complicated as it sounds. There are many tutorials on how to build programs from source.

I understand that providing official packages for fedora/rhel, Ubuntu/debian, and arch-based distro packages along with a flatpack and Appimage would make a lot of sense, but for whatever reason, signal has decided not to. Perhaps you can message the signal team to ask why they choose not to do this.

[–] theorangeninja@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago

Appreciated, maybe I'll try it in the future.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 5 months ago

Sometimes it comes down to support. For every distro specific format you build and package for, the more you need to do with every release (and need the proper config and to be comfortable packaging for each).