Free and Open Source Software

17957 readers

130 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

Signal on Linux (lemmy.today)

submitted 5 months ago by theorangeninja@lemmy.today to c/foss@beehaw.org

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

How is it possible, that Signal still only provides a .deb package and no .rpm, or even better AppImage or Flatpak? There is an unofficial Flatpak but is it secure?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Some projects of Signal-compatible clients and forks received a message from a Signal representrive requesting they stop distributing unofficial clients that connect to their servers.

That probably has on shilling effect on Linux distribution that may be considering building and distributing Signal in their repository.

[–] theorangeninja@lemmy.today 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They should provide an app for other distros then!

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

They can't possibly provide a package for every distro.

Signal's model, ie keep tight control over development and distribution of the client, and the absence of federation, it well suited for Apple/Google's stores, but not at all for open-source and Linux' ecosystem.

[–] theorangeninja@lemmy.today 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

AppImages run on nearly every distro. Why arw they not providing that instead of a .deb?

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago

Yes, AppImage can run on more distro.

Still AppImage has disadvantages over DEB: No auto-update, No/less system integration, Bigger install packages.

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You are right. They can’t for every distro.

But fedora/rhel, Ubuntu/debian, and arch-based distros are the most commonly used. So they can provide official packages for those, and/or as the OP said, provide an official flatpak.

And to be fair, it’s a nice-to-have to have a better sense of trust, but given the unofficial ones are open source, it’s quite likely any maliciousness would be rooted out very quickly.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 5 months ago

Or, if you are running one of those distros you could just take the .deb and repackage it for whatever distro you're running. Expecting a project to package for every distro, and then be required to support them for every release is a lot of work. And unfortunately some people have no issues expecting from others, but baulk at the idea of doing it themselves.