this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
359 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59300 readers
4818 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

there are a ton of security experts. But none of them are the former head of the NSA.

That doesn't make the point you think it makes. ๐Ÿ™‚

Look at it this way. You can get the same expertise, in any branch you'd care to name, elsewhere. Hiring, security etc.

What this guy is uniquely positioned to do, what you can't get from anybody else, is oversight of integration with NSA surveillance. And that's where the smell comes from.

[โ€“] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Well, I'd contend that the same expertise isn't just readily available. Yes, he's uniquely positioned for connection to the surveillance apparatus, but the reputation of being the federal governments head security is also a unique credential.