tumblr

3419 readers

305 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.

Sister Communities:

/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

1015

VCs, Very Smart (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world to c/tumblr@lemmy.world

93 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So that's what we use AI for, solving the climate crisis!

Whew, glad we got that settled.

[+] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com -7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_model

Cloud-resolving climate models are nowadays run on high intensity super-computers which have a high power consumption and thus cause CO2 emissions.[44] They require exascale computing [..]. For example, the Frontier exascale supercomputer consumes 29 MW.[45] It can simulate a year’s worth of climate at cloud resolving scales in a day.[46]

Techniques that could lead to energy savings, include for example: "reducing floating point precision computation; developing machine learning algorithms to avoid unnecessary computations; and creating a new generation of scalable numerical algorithms that would enable higher throughput in terms of simulated years per wall clock day."[44]

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Let me point a critical part that you seemed to have skipped:

... to avoid unnecessary computations...

Using ML algorithms to add more computations that weren't necessary doesn't help. Using it to improve computations can, if it's more efficient than not using it. ML can be a useful and good thing, but the extreme vast majority of what it's currently being used for is trying to come up with more places to shove it where it doesn't reduce computations and instead increases it.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago

I just copied the Wikipedia part, because I thought it funny how AI in media is different from AI in science. I don't have a stance on the power consumption of climate models because without the models we'd be very unequipped for the storm we brew.

Sorry for creating the image of me criticising valuable science.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~gamvrosi/thelastq.html

[–] original2@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Chilling.